Someone else’s agent. You are reading its record; nothing here can be changed from this page.

1. 01The decision

   What

   Would have acted

   Mode

   Practice, spending nothing

   How sure

   92%

   When

   Tue 15:16 ET

2. 02Why it looked

   Nvidia is 10.0% of the desk against a target of 40.0%. That is further than the 3.0% it may wander.

3. 03What it saw

   In line (±0.5%)

   Market session

   regular · price anchored by market makers

   Reference: the last official update

   $229.02739517 · set 4 days ago · the pool was in line it

   What this trade costs

   0.05% · (the 0.05% pool fee, plus what its size moves the price)

   Trading status

   trading is open

   Company event

   Reports on 2026-11-17, after the close, in 56 days. Trading can pause around it.

   The owner’s limits at that moment

   $5.00 per action · $15.00 left today · $5.21 cash in the account

   Headlines naming the company in the last 72 hours (5)

   Yahoo · 4 days agoYahoo · 4 days agoYahoo · 4 days ago

   The headline text is not shown here: our news licence does not allow passing it on.

4. 04The options it weighed

   Do it nowchosen

   Act now because Nvidia is far below target and the price is in line with the last official update.

   • The desk is regular-session anchored, so timing can be judged normally.
   • The pool price is 30 bps above the last official update, which is in line and a normal gap.
   • The exact trade cost is 5 bps, which is modest versus the rebalancing need.
   • Trading is not halted or paused, so action is available now.
   • Nvidia is 10.0% of the desk against a 40.0% target, beyond the allowed wander, so the buy is required by the mandate.
   • The company headlines are untrusted and do not clearly explain the small gap.

   Do part of it nowturned down

   Partial action is unnecessary because the trade is small and timing risk is low.

   Wait for the market to reopenturned down

   Waiting would delay a required rebalance while the price is in line and the market is open.

   Do not do itturned down

   The mandate requires rebalancing because Nvidia is outside the allowed wander.

   Per-action and daily USDG limits still need to be respected outside this timing decision.

5. 05The limits check

   This part is plain arithmetic, not an assistant. It can refuse, and it can never start anything.

   Every limit passed.

   • Counts against your limits$1.74

6. 06The cost, shown before acting

   $It would spend$1.74

   It should receive0.00755222 Nvidia

   The least it would accept

   0.00751445 Nvidia

   Slippage allowed

   0.50%

7. 07What happened

   • checkpointconfirmed0x546d30fde0…00617e29 ↗

   network fee 0.0000030 ETH, paid by the assistant

8. 08Proof

   1. Written down#2 · Tue 15:16 ET
   2. Fingerprinted0xeb226926…e75925
   3. On the public network0x546d30fd…617e29 ↗

   The fingerprint of this record was written on the public network in the same transaction as the action it describes. Nobody can change the record now without the change being visible.

   Check itDownload this recordShow the exact bytes

   Your browser will rebuild this record’s fingerprint from the bytes below, then ask the public network for the fingerprint it holds and compare the two. The network is asked directly from your browser; nothing goes through us.

9. 09How it looks now

   The alternative would have been better by 0.73%.