SHIJIMAAI AGENTS · ROBINHOOD
← every decision

Someone else’s agent. You are reading its record; nothing here can be changed from this page.

Would have actedPractice

Buy $0.50 of S&P 500 fund

Buy the S&P 500 fund now because the rebalance is required and the price is in line.

#1Fri 13:27 ET

86%sure
  1. 01The decision

    What
    Would have acted
    Mode
    Practice, spending nothing
    How sure
    86%
    When
    Fri 13:27 ET
  2. 02Why it looked

    S&P 500 fund is 0.0% of the agent’s value against a target of 50.0%. That is further than the 3.0% it may wander.

    Now 0.0%Target 50.0%It may wander 3.0% either way
  3. 03What it saw

    In line (±0.5%)
    Pool price$771.99Reference$772.33
    Market session
    regular · price anchored by market makers
    Reference: the last official update
    $772.32802713 · set 14 days ago · the pool was in line it
    What this trade costs
    0.05% · (the 0.05% pool fee, plus what its size moves the price)
    Trading status
    trading is open
    The owner’s limits at that moment
    $49.00 per action · $50.00 left today · $1.00 cash in the account
    Headlines naming the company in the last 72 hours (3)

    The headline text is not shown here: our news licence does not allow passing it on.

  4. 04The options it weighed

    Do it nowchosen

    Buy the S&P 500 fund now because the rebalance is required and the price is in line.

    • The S&P 500 fund is 0.0% versus a 50.0% target, beyond the allowed wander, so the rebalance must be acted on.
    • The price is in line with the last official update, with a 4 bps gap in a regular anchored session, so timing is not a reason to wait.
    • The trade is allowed under limits, and the exact cost is modest at 5 bps against the pool price.
    • The listed headlines are untrusted and do not give material company news that explains the small gap.
    Wait for the market to reopenturned down

    Would delay a required rebalance even though the price is in line and the session is anchored. Evidence: e1, e2, e7.

    Do part of it nowturned down

    A partial fill is unnecessary because the proposal is already a small, permitted action and the mandate calls for rebalancing now. Evidence: e6, e7.

    Do not do itturned down

    Would leave the holding far outside the allowed range. Evidence: e7.

  5. 05The limits check

    This part is plain arithmetic, not an assistant. It can refuse, and it can never start anything.

    Every limit passed.

    • Counts against your limits$0.50
  6. 06The cost, shown before acting

    It would spend$0.50
    It should receive0.000647349 S&P 500 fund
    The least it would accept
    0.000644112 S&P 500 fund
    Slippage allowed
    0.50%
  7. 07What happened

    Nothing was sent.

  8. 08Proof

    1. Written down#1 · Fri 13:27 ET
    2. Fingerprinted0x3518e326…984a24
    3. On the public network0x81d4e389…1c97f8 ↗

    This record did nothing on the chain, so it has no transaction of its own. Record #2 was written on the public network later, and every record in between names the fingerprint of the one before it, so that fingerprint commits to this record too.

    Your browser will rebuild this record’s fingerprint from the bytes below, then ask the public network for the fingerprint it holds and compare the two. The network is asked directly from your browser; nothing goes through us.

  9. 09How it looks now

    The alternative would have been better by 0.33%.